Business Strategy

The ‘Great Retirement’ – Trouble ahead?

  • February 28, 2022

The Great Retirement may have become one of the unforeseen consequences of the Covid pandemic. Governments have been trying to nudge people into working longer by abolishing compulsory retirement, raising pension ages and encouraging employers to recruit workers in their 60s. By and large it has been working. The average age at which people leave the labour market has been rising in most OECD countries since 2000.

But Covid seems to have thrown this trend into reverse. Recent data from the UK’s Department for Work and Pensions shows that the average age of retirement and the employment rate of older workers has been falling since the pandemic. The UK now has 1 million fewer workers than it did in 2019. One quarter of that fall is accounted for by 50-64 year olds becoming economically inactive. Similar patterns have been reported in the US and Australia. This will not be welcome news for governments or for employers. 

The 2020s is the decade during which the challenge of an ageing population shifts from being tomorrow’s problem to today’s. In many countries, falling birth rates and rising longevity have raised the average age of populations. As a result, there is an increase in what economists call the dependency ratio – indicating the proportion dependent on the working age population. Most advanced economies and many emerging ones will see their dependency ratio increase over the next decade. 

This leaves governments, employers, and employees facing a potential ‘perfect storm’.

  • For employees, low investment returns, the likelihood of less government financial support arising from a worsening fiscal position, and the withdrawal of many employers from meaningful pension provision, combine to threaten leaving an ever-increasing number of people with inadequate funds for their income in later life. Increasingly, both the investment risk (whether investments generate an adequate return) and the longevity risk (whether people live longer than they budgeted for) are now borne by the employee.
  • For employers, there is the threat of skills shortages as working-age populations decline and the post-war population bulges retire, taking their skills with them. There is a perception that a workforce skewed towards the upper age range may find it more difficult to acquire new skills or change jobs, thereby hampering the ability to respond rapidly to shifting market conditions. Yet, with the likelihood of labour shortages across the globe, employers will need to learn to manage older workers more flexibly and effectively.
  • Governments face the combination of economic stagnation, increased pressure on pensions and healthcare spending, massive public investment to reach Carbon Net Zero and increased debt resulting from the Covid pandemic. A cohort of underfunded retirees – requiring more support and yielding less tax revenue – presents a significant fiscal challenge on top of those already faced. The next decade’s fiscal forecasts look challenging for most countries, and parlous for some. 

Perhaps, there couldn’t be a worse time for the over-50s to start leaving the workforce in droves. It would further shrink an already shrinking workforce, add to governments’ fiscal challenges and would be storing up trouble later in life for people who have retired early without properly assessing their longevity or the state of their long-term finances.

So far, few employers appear to have paid much attention to this problem, but skills shortages and a tighter labour market are likely to mean that employment policies to address the needs of older workers will assume a new importance. Mercer’s Global Talent Trends study in 2020 showed that 97% of C-suite are concerned about high performers in their organisations taking early retirement but only 33% of employers have an active programme in place to manage retirement. Demographic projections suggest that the recent skills shortages may become a recurring feature of the 2020s economy. It will be in the interest of many companies to encourage older workers to stay in employment. Flexible working policies, targeted development plans, recognition of healthcare needs, and support with financial education and planning are among the many measures that some employers have introduced to support older workers. Given the increased scrutiny companies are facing to demonstrate the strength of their ESG position, how a company supports its employees in later life may become a source of strategic competitive advantage for those companies that do, and a reputational risk for those that don’t.

On Friday 11th March, to examine these issues in greater detail, PARC published a discussion paper on Retirement Strategy. This outlined the critical issues to be addressed, and highlighted some of the emerging best practice. The paper was also the focus for discussion at a PARC member meeting on Wednesday 23rd March, at which experienced practitioners and experts in the field of retirement and reward gave their insights. The Post Meeting Notes summarise the discussion and outputs of this meeting.

PARC RESEARCH:

Retirement Strategy: Does your company have one, does it want one?

Related content

Join PARC today

  • Research and resources for HR and Reward leaders
  • Regular webinars, peer exchanges and in-person events on business and reward topics
  • Advisory support including member surveys, curated content and insights from experts
  • Brokered connections with HR and Reward leaders to share knowledge and good practice
  • Development programmes for future reward leaders

Forgot your password?

Don’t have an account? Become a member and gain access to:

  • Research and resources for HR and Reward leaders
  • Regular interactive webinars, peer exchanges and in-person events on business and reward topics
  • Advisory support including member surveys, curated content and insights from experts
  • Brokered connections with HR and Reward leaders to share knowledge and good practice
  • Development programmes for future reward leaders