June 22nd 2017
Incentives for Motivation and Performance: Current practice and future direction
PARC last looked comprehensively at incentive reward in 2010, in conjunction with WorldatWork.
The report reviewed the principal theories of motivation and findings on engagement, and
explored via survey and qualitative interviews how organisations were tackling the development of incentive plans. There was particular interest in how organisations found the right balance across a series of dilemmas inherent in designing and operating incentive schemes:
- Using multiple measures vs keeping it simple
- Keeping it current vs keeping it constant
- Following market practice vs customising to strategy
- ‘Incentives’ vs ‘rewards’
- ‘Pay for performance’ vs ‘perceived fairness’.
The business, political and societal context for incentives has certainly moved on since then, and the subject has come under increased public and regulatory scrutiny. Executive pay, its perceived excesses, governance and future development have been the subject of much reporting and debate over the years – to which PARC has obviously contributed. But sometimes it seems as though this is the only aspect of reward and incentives that is getting any airtime.
This short report starts by recapping the evolution of theories on the link between incentives and motivation, and summarises recent evidence on the linkage (or not) between incentives and performance. Does the evidence show whether incentives make a real difference to performance? And if they don’t, why are they still so all-pervasive?
It goes on to explore what organisations are currently doing in the world of incentives in levels below the Executive Team, and why, and what the direction of travel looks like. Are the dilemmas previously explored still relevant, or have they been superseded? How do organisations, particularly complex ones, exert appropriate governance? Is there a trend towards simplification? Are people taking more account of teams, or is it still mostly about the individual? Are organisations being inventive, or are they all working with the same models?
Exploring these issues seemed to raise more questions than give easy answers, so it is probably fair to say that Reward Professionals will be in keen demand for the foreseeable future! It will be interesting to see how the emergent themes play out over the next few annual cycles.
This resource is available to PARC members only. To access, please log in with your username and password.
You May Also be Interested in
January 14th 2014
Edit document: Progress - Issue 1: People, Not ProcessesRead Article
March 28th 2016
Post-Meeting Review Notes: Mind the Gap - what's new with equal pay?
These post-meeting review notes summarise the member forum held on 17 March 2017, where we looked at the issues surrounding equal pay and the recent developments in legislation.Read Post Meeting Review
May 3rd 2017
The Reform of Executive Pay - Interview with Alex Edmans
In this interview with Alex Edmans, Professor of Finance at London Business School, we are looking at the issue of executive rewardWatch Video
May 8th 2017
The Reform of Executive Reward
The recent PARC meeting focused on the following problem areas within executive reward: - the quantum of overall pay - the design of reward plans - the governance framework within which it operates.Read Post Meeting Review
September 21st 2017
Risk - what does it mean for the progressive HR function?
Over the past few years, the scope and scale of risks to which organisations are exposed have proliferated e.g. cybersecurity, data threats, terrorism, reputation – and these risks can be both outside and inside the organisation. Unsurprisingly, the level at which they are discussed and governed has escalated accordingly.Read Post Meeting Review
December 5th 2017
2018 PARC Programme
Our 2018 PARC Programme sets out the topics we will be discussing in the coming year, all of which are relevant to the wider business agendas of members and the continuing success of their organisations.Read Event Document